tornadocontrib/bsc
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
integration_with_VersaDB
bsc/internal/ethapi/testdata/eth_getBlockByHash-hash-latest-1-fullTx.json

41 lines
2.1 KiB
JSON
Raw Permalink Normal View History

internal/ethapi: add testcases for blobTx (#27818) Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
2023-08-22 08:53:29 +08:00
{
"baseFeePerGas": "0x121a9cca",
"difficulty": "0x20000",
"extraData": "0x",
"gasLimit": "0x47e7c4",
"gasUsed": "0x5208",
internal/ethapi: handle blobs in API methods (#28786) EIP-4844 adds a new transaction type for blobs. Users can submit such transactions via `eth_sendRawTransaction`. In this PR we refrain from adding support to `eth_sendTransaction` and in fact it will fail if the user passes in a blob hash. However since the chain can handle such transactions it makes sense to allow simulating them. E.g. an L2 operator should be able to simulate submitting a rollup blob and updating the L2 state. Most methods that take in a transaction object should recognize blobs. The change boils down to adding `blobVersionedHashes` and `maxFeePerBlobGas` to `TransactionArgs`. In summary: - `eth_sendTransaction`: will fail for blob txes - `eth_signTransaction`: will fail for blob txes The methods that sign txes does not, as of this PR, add support the for new EIP-4844 transaction types. Resuming the summary: - `eth_sendRawTransaction`: can send blob txes - `eth_fillTransaction`: will fill in a blob tx. Note: here we simply fill in normal transaction fields + possibly `maxFeePerBlobGas` when blobs are present. One can imagine a more elaborate set-up where users can submit blobs themselves and we fill in proofs and commitments and such. Left for future PRs if desired. - `eth_call`: can simulate blob messages - `eth_estimateGas`: blobs have no effect here. They have a separate unit of gas which is not tunable in the transaction.
2024-01-17 17:36:14 +03:30
"hash": "0xedb9ccf3a85f67c095ad48abfb0fa09d47179bb0f902078d289042d12428aca5",
internal/ethapi: add testcases for blobTx (#27818) Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
2023-08-22 08:53:29 +08:00
"logsBloom": "0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"miner": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"mixHash": "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
"nonce": "0x0000000000000000",
"number": "0x9",
internal/ethapi: handle blobs in API methods (#28786) EIP-4844 adds a new transaction type for blobs. Users can submit such transactions via `eth_sendRawTransaction`. In this PR we refrain from adding support to `eth_sendTransaction` and in fact it will fail if the user passes in a blob hash. However since the chain can handle such transactions it makes sense to allow simulating them. E.g. an L2 operator should be able to simulate submitting a rollup blob and updating the L2 state. Most methods that take in a transaction object should recognize blobs. The change boils down to adding `blobVersionedHashes` and `maxFeePerBlobGas` to `TransactionArgs`. In summary: - `eth_sendTransaction`: will fail for blob txes - `eth_signTransaction`: will fail for blob txes The methods that sign txes does not, as of this PR, add support the for new EIP-4844 transaction types. Resuming the summary: - `eth_sendRawTransaction`: can send blob txes - `eth_fillTransaction`: will fill in a blob tx. Note: here we simply fill in normal transaction fields + possibly `maxFeePerBlobGas` when blobs are present. One can imagine a more elaborate set-up where users can submit blobs themselves and we fill in proofs and commitments and such. Left for future PRs if desired. - `eth_call`: can simulate blob messages - `eth_estimateGas`: blobs have no effect here. They have a separate unit of gas which is not tunable in the transaction.
2024-01-17 17:36:14 +03:30
"parentHash": "0xcd7d78eaa8b0ddbd2956fc37e1883c30df27b43e8cc9a982020310656736637c",
internal/ethapi: add testcases for blobTx (#27818) Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
2023-08-22 08:53:29 +08:00
"receiptsRoot": "0x056b23fbba480696b65fe5a59b8f2148a1299103c4f57df839233af2cf4ca2d2",
"sha3Uncles": "0x1dcc4de8dec75d7aab85b567b6ccd41ad312451b948a7413f0a142fd40d49347",
"size": "0x26a",
internal/ethapi: handle blobs in API methods (#28786) EIP-4844 adds a new transaction type for blobs. Users can submit such transactions via `eth_sendRawTransaction`. In this PR we refrain from adding support to `eth_sendTransaction` and in fact it will fail if the user passes in a blob hash. However since the chain can handle such transactions it makes sense to allow simulating them. E.g. an L2 operator should be able to simulate submitting a rollup blob and updating the L2 state. Most methods that take in a transaction object should recognize blobs. The change boils down to adding `blobVersionedHashes` and `maxFeePerBlobGas` to `TransactionArgs`. In summary: - `eth_sendTransaction`: will fail for blob txes - `eth_signTransaction`: will fail for blob txes The methods that sign txes does not, as of this PR, add support the for new EIP-4844 transaction types. Resuming the summary: - `eth_sendRawTransaction`: can send blob txes - `eth_fillTransaction`: will fill in a blob tx. Note: here we simply fill in normal transaction fields + possibly `maxFeePerBlobGas` when blobs are present. One can imagine a more elaborate set-up where users can submit blobs themselves and we fill in proofs and commitments and such. Left for future PRs if desired. - `eth_call`: can simulate blob messages - `eth_estimateGas`: blobs have no effect here. They have a separate unit of gas which is not tunable in the transaction.
2024-01-17 17:36:14 +03:30
"stateRoot": "0x78b2b19ef1a0276dbbc23a875dbf60ae5d10dafa0017098473c4871abd3e7b5c",
internal/ethapi: add testcases for blobTx (#27818) Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
2023-08-22 08:53:29 +08:00
"timestamp": "0x5a",
"totalDifficulty": "0x1",
"transactions": [
{
internal/ethapi: handle blobs in API methods (#28786) EIP-4844 adds a new transaction type for blobs. Users can submit such transactions via `eth_sendRawTransaction`. In this PR we refrain from adding support to `eth_sendTransaction` and in fact it will fail if the user passes in a blob hash. However since the chain can handle such transactions it makes sense to allow simulating them. E.g. an L2 operator should be able to simulate submitting a rollup blob and updating the L2 state. Most methods that take in a transaction object should recognize blobs. The change boils down to adding `blobVersionedHashes` and `maxFeePerBlobGas` to `TransactionArgs`. In summary: - `eth_sendTransaction`: will fail for blob txes - `eth_signTransaction`: will fail for blob txes The methods that sign txes does not, as of this PR, add support the for new EIP-4844 transaction types. Resuming the summary: - `eth_sendRawTransaction`: can send blob txes - `eth_fillTransaction`: will fill in a blob tx. Note: here we simply fill in normal transaction fields + possibly `maxFeePerBlobGas` when blobs are present. One can imagine a more elaborate set-up where users can submit blobs themselves and we fill in proofs and commitments and such. Left for future PRs if desired. - `eth_call`: can simulate blob messages - `eth_estimateGas`: blobs have no effect here. They have a separate unit of gas which is not tunable in the transaction.
2024-01-17 17:36:14 +03:30
"blockHash": "0xedb9ccf3a85f67c095ad48abfb0fa09d47179bb0f902078d289042d12428aca5",
internal/ethapi: add testcases for blobTx (#27818) Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
2023-08-22 08:53:29 +08:00
"blockNumber": "0x9",
"from": "0x703c4b2bd70c169f5717101caee543299fc946c7",
"gas": "0x5208",
"gasPrice": "0x121a9cca",
"hash": "0xecd155a61a5734b3efab75924e3ae34026c7c4133d8c2a46122bd03d7d199725",
"input": "0x",
"nonce": "0x8",
"to": "0x0d3ab14bbad3d99f4203bd7a11acb94882050e7e",
"transactionIndex": "0x0",
"value": "0x3e8",
"type": "0x0",
"v": "0x1b",
"r": "0xc6028b8e983d62fa8542f8a7633fb23cc941be2c897134352d95a7d9b19feafd",
"s": "0xeb6adcaaae3bed489c6cce4435f9db05d23a52820c78bd350e31eec65ed809d"
}
],
"transactionsRoot": "0x0767ed8359337dc6a8fdc77fe52db611bed1be87aac73c4556b1bf1dd3d190a5",
"uncles": []
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink