* core: added local tx pool test case
* core, crypto: various allocation savings regarding tx handling
* core/txlist, txpool: save a reheap operation, avoid some bigint allocs
Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
This change introduces garbage collection for the light client. Historical
chain data is deleted periodically. If you want to disable the GC, use
the --light.nopruning flag.
Reverting because this change started handling account balances as
uint64 in the transaction pool, which is incorrect.
This reverts commit af5c97aebe1d37486635521ef553cb8bd4bada13.
This change further improves the performance of RLP encoding by removing
allocations for big.Int and [...]byte types. I have added a new benchmark
that measures RLP encoding of types.Block to verify that performance is
improved.
* core: use uint64 for total tx costs instead of big.Int
* core: added local tx pool test case
* core, crypto: various allocation savings regarding tx handling
* Update core/tx_list.go
* core: added tx.GasPriceIntCmp for comparison without allocation
adds a method to remove unneeded allocation in comparison to tx.gasPrice
* core: handle pools full of locals better
* core/tests: benchmark for tx_list
* core/txlist, txpool: save a reheap operation, avoid some bigint allocs
Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
* core, crypto: various allocation savings regarding tx handling
* core: reduce allocs for gas price comparison
This change reduces the allocations needed for comparing different transactions to each other.
A call to `tx.GasPrice()` copies the gas price as it has to be safe against modifications and
also needs to be threadsafe. For comparing and ordering different transactions we don't need
these guarantees
* core: added tx.GasPriceIntCmp for comparison without allocation
adds a method to remove unneeded allocation in comparison to tx.gasPrice
* core/types: pool legacykeccak256 objects in rlpHash
rlpHash is by far the most used function in core that allocates a legacyKeccak256 object on each call.
Since it is so widely used it makes sense to add pooling here so we relieve the GC.
On my machine these changes result in > 100 MILLION less allocations and > 30 GB less allocated memory.
* reverted some changes
* reverted some changes
* trie: use crypto.KeccakState instead of replicating code
Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
This PR implements the EVM state transition tool, which is intended
to be the replacement for our retesteth client implementation.
Documentation is present in the cmd/evm/README.md file.
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
* core/vm: fix incorrect computation of discount
During testing on Yolov1 we found that the way geth calculates the discount
is not in line with the specification. Basically what we did is calculate
128 * Bls12381GXMulGas * discount / 1000 whenever we received more than 128 pairs
of values. Correct would be to calculate k * Bls12381... for k > 128.
* core/vm: better logic for discount calculation
* core/vm: better calculation logic, added worstcase benchmarks
* core/vm: better benchmarking logic
The ancients variable in the freezer is a list of hashes, which
identifies all of the hashes to be frozen. The slice is being allocated
with a capacity of `limit`, which is the number of the last block
this batch will attempt to add to the freezer. That means we are
allocating memory for all of the blocks in the freezer, not just
the ones to be added.
If instead we allocate `limit - f.frozen`, we will only allocate
enough space for the blocks we're about to add to the freezer. On
mainnet this reduces usage by about 320 MB.
* core/vm: use fixed uint256 library instead of big
* core/vm: remove intpools
* core/vm: upgrade uint256, fixes uint256.NewFromBig
* core/vm: use uint256.Int by value in Stack
* core/vm: upgrade uint256 to v1.0.0
* core/vm: don't preallocate space for 1024 stack items (only 16)
Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
Once we detect an invalid transaction during recovering signatures, we should
directly exclude this transaction to avoid validating the signatures hereafter.
This should optimize the validations times of transactions with invalid signatures
to only one time.
This adds a new API method on core.BlockChain to allow interrupting
running data inserts, and calls the method before shutting down the
downloader.
The BlockChain interrupt checks are now done through a method instead
of inlining the atomic load everywhere. There is no loss of efficiency from
this and it makes the interrupt protocol a lot clearer because the check is
defined next to the method that sets the flag.
This PR reimplements the light client server pool. It is also a first step
to move certain logic into a new lespay package. This package will contain
the implementation of the lespay token sale functions, the token buying and
selling logic and other components related to peer selection/prioritization
and service quality evaluation. Over the long term this package will be
reusable for incentivizing future protocols.
Since the LES peer logic is now based on enode.Iterator, it can now use
DNS-based fallback discovery to find servers.
This document describes the function of the new components:
https://gist.github.com/zsfelfoldi/3c7ace895234b7b345ab4f71dab102d4
* cmd, core, eth: init tx lookup in background
* core/rawdb: tiny log fixes to make it clearer what's happening
* core, eth: fix rebase errors
* core/rawdb: make reindexing less generic, but more optimal
* rlp: implement rlp list iterator
* core/rawdb: new implementation of tx indexing/unindex using generic tx iterator and hashing rlp-data
* core/rawdb, cmd/utils: fix review concerns
* cmd/utils: fix merge issue
* core/rawdb: add some log formatting polishes
Co-authored-by: rjl493456442 <garyrong0905@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Péter Szilágyi <peterke@gmail.com>
* core/rawdb: Stop freezer process as part of freezer.Close()
When you call db.Close(), it was closing the leveldb database first,
then closing the freezer, but never stopping the freezer process.
This could cause the freezer to attempt to write to leveldb after
leveldb had been closed, leading to a crash with a non-zero exit code.
This change adds a quit channel to the freezer, and freezer.Close()
will not return until the freezer process has stopped.
Additionally, when you call freezerdb.Close(), it will close the
AncientStore before closing leveldb, to ensure that the freezer goroutine
will be stopped before leveldb is closed.
* core/rawdb: Fix formatting for golint
* core/rawdb: Use backoff flag to avoid repeating select
* core/rawdb: Include accidentally omitted backoff
* core/state: more verbose stateb errors
* core/state: fix flaw
* core/state: fixed lint
Co-authored-by: Marius van der Wijden <m.vanderwijden@live.de>
This finally adds the error check that the documentation of StateDB.dbErr
promises to do. dbErr was added in 9e5f03b6c (June 2017), and the check was
already missing in that commit. We somehow survived without it for three years.
* core/state/snapshot: implement storage iterator
* core/state/snapshot, tests: implement helper function
* core/state/snapshot: fix storage issue
If an account is deleted in the tx_1 but recreated in the tx_2,
the it can happen that in this diff layer, both destructedSet
and storageData records this account. In this case, the storage
iterator should be able to iterate the slots belong to new account
but disable further iteration in deeper layers(belong to old account)
* core/state/snapshot: address peter and martin's comment
* core/state: address comments
* core/state/snapshot: fix test
This is a resubmit of #20668 which rewrites the problematic test
without any additional goroutines. It also documents the test better.
The purpose of this test is checking whether log events are sent
correctly when importing blocks. The test was written at a time when
blockchain events were delivered asynchronously, making the check hard
to pull off. Now that core.BlockChain delivers events synchronously
during the call to InsertChain, the test can be simplified.
Co-authored-by: BurtonQin <bobbqqin@gmail.com>
This fixes a theoretical double lock condition which could occur in
indexer.AddChildIndexer(indexer)
Nobody would ever do that though.
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
