bsc/trie/stacktrie_test.go
lightclient bbfb1e4008
all: add support for EIP-2718, EIP-2930 transactions (#21502)
This adds support for EIP-2718 typed transactions as well as EIP-2930
access list transactions (tx type 1). These EIPs are scheduled for the
Berlin fork.

There very few changes to existing APIs in core/types, and several new APIs
to deal with access list transactions. In particular, there are two new
constructor functions for transactions: types.NewTx and types.SignNewTx.
Since the canonical encoding of typed transactions is not RLP-compatible,
Transaction now has new methods for encoding and decoding: MarshalBinary
and UnmarshalBinary.

The existing EIP-155 signer does not support the new transaction types.
All code dealing with transaction signatures should be updated to use the
newer EIP-2930 signer. To make this easier for future updates, we have
added new constructor functions for types.Signer: types.LatestSigner and
types.LatestSignerForChainID. 

This change also adds support for the YoloV3 testnet.

Co-authored-by: Martin Holst Swende <martin@swende.se>
Co-authored-by: Felix Lange <fjl@twurst.com>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Schneider <ryanleeschneider@gmail.com>
2021-02-25 15:26:57 +01:00

122 lines
3.9 KiB
Go

package trie
import (
"testing"
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common"
"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/ethdb/memorydb"
)
func TestSizeBug(t *testing.T) {
st := NewStackTrie(nil)
nt, _ := New(common.Hash{}, NewDatabase(memorydb.New()))
leaf := common.FromHex("290decd9548b62a8d60345a988386fc84ba6bc95484008f6362f93160ef3e563")
value := common.FromHex("94cf40d0d2b44f2b66e07cace1372ca42b73cf21a3")
nt.TryUpdate(leaf, value)
st.TryUpdate(leaf, value)
if nt.Hash() != st.Hash() {
t.Fatalf("error %x != %x", st.Hash(), nt.Hash())
}
}
func TestEmptyBug(t *testing.T) {
st := NewStackTrie(nil)
nt, _ := New(common.Hash{}, NewDatabase(memorydb.New()))
//leaf := common.FromHex("290decd9548b62a8d60345a988386fc84ba6bc95484008f6362f93160ef3e563")
//value := common.FromHex("94cf40d0d2b44f2b66e07cace1372ca42b73cf21a3")
kvs := []struct {
K string
V string
}{
{K: "405787fa12a823e0f2b7631cc41b3ba8828b3321ca811111fa75cd3aa3bb5ace", V: "9496f4ec2bf9dab484cac6be589e8417d84781be08"},
{K: "40edb63a35fcf86c08022722aa3287cdd36440d671b4918131b2514795fefa9c", V: "01"},
{K: "b10e2d527612073b26eecdfd717e6a320cf44b4afac2b0732d9fcbe2b7fa0cf6", V: "947a30f7736e48d6599356464ba4c150d8da0302ff"},
{K: "c2575a0e9e593c00f959f8c92f12db2869c3395a3b0502d05e2516446f71f85b", V: "02"},
}
for _, kv := range kvs {
nt.TryUpdate(common.FromHex(kv.K), common.FromHex(kv.V))
st.TryUpdate(common.FromHex(kv.K), common.FromHex(kv.V))
}
if nt.Hash() != st.Hash() {
t.Fatalf("error %x != %x", st.Hash(), nt.Hash())
}
}
func TestValLength56(t *testing.T) {
st := NewStackTrie(nil)
nt, _ := New(common.Hash{}, NewDatabase(memorydb.New()))
//leaf := common.FromHex("290decd9548b62a8d60345a988386fc84ba6bc95484008f6362f93160ef3e563")
//value := common.FromHex("94cf40d0d2b44f2b66e07cace1372ca42b73cf21a3")
kvs := []struct {
K string
V string
}{
{K: "405787fa12a823e0f2b7631cc41b3ba8828b3321ca811111fa75cd3aa3bb5ace", V: "1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111"},
}
for _, kv := range kvs {
nt.TryUpdate(common.FromHex(kv.K), common.FromHex(kv.V))
st.TryUpdate(common.FromHex(kv.K), common.FromHex(kv.V))
}
if nt.Hash() != st.Hash() {
t.Fatalf("error %x != %x", st.Hash(), nt.Hash())
}
}
// TestUpdateSmallNodes tests a case where the leaves are small (both key and value),
// which causes a lot of node-within-node. This case was found via fuzzing.
func TestUpdateSmallNodes(t *testing.T) {
st := NewStackTrie(nil)
nt, _ := New(common.Hash{}, NewDatabase(memorydb.New()))
kvs := []struct {
K string
V string
}{
{"63303030", "3041"}, // stacktrie.Update
{"65", "3000"}, // stacktrie.Update
}
for _, kv := range kvs {
nt.TryUpdate(common.FromHex(kv.K), common.FromHex(kv.V))
st.TryUpdate(common.FromHex(kv.K), common.FromHex(kv.V))
}
if nt.Hash() != st.Hash() {
t.Fatalf("error %x != %x", st.Hash(), nt.Hash())
}
}
// TestUpdateVariableKeys contains a case which stacktrie fails: when keys of different
// sizes are used, and the second one has the same prefix as the first, then the
// stacktrie fails, since it's unable to 'expand' on an already added leaf.
// For all practical purposes, this is fine, since keys are fixed-size length
// in account and storage tries.
//
// The test is marked as 'skipped', and exists just to have the behaviour documented.
// This case was found via fuzzing.
func TestUpdateVariableKeys(t *testing.T) {
t.SkipNow()
st := NewStackTrie(nil)
nt, _ := New(common.Hash{}, NewDatabase(memorydb.New()))
kvs := []struct {
K string
V string
}{
{"0x33303534636532393561313031676174", "303030"},
{"0x3330353463653239356131303167617430", "313131"},
}
for _, kv := range kvs {
nt.TryUpdate(common.FromHex(kv.K), common.FromHex(kv.V))
st.TryUpdate(common.FromHex(kv.K), common.FromHex(kv.V))
}
if nt.Hash() != st.Hash() {
t.Fatalf("error %x != %x", st.Hash(), nt.Hash())
}
}