temp fix while filtering is improved

This commit is contained in:
Bryan Stitt 2023-06-17 12:09:04 -07:00
parent 3b65074f38
commit 5367c51195
2 changed files with 8 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -1437,7 +1437,8 @@ mod tests {
let names_in_sort_order: Vec<_> = rpcs.iter().map(|x| x.name.as_str()).collect();
assert_eq!(names_in_sort_order, ["c", "b", "a", "f", "e", "d"]);
// TODO: if we prioritize tier over block_num, this is:["c", "b", "a", "f", "e", "d"]
assert_eq!(names_in_sort_order, ["c", "f", "b", "e", "a", "d"]);
}
#[tokio::test(start_paused = true)]

View File

@ -233,12 +233,12 @@ impl Web3Rpc {
/// sort by...
/// - backups last
/// - tier (ascending)
/// - block number (descending)
/// - tier (ascending)
/// TODO: tests on this!
/// TODO: should tier or block number take priority?
/// TODO: should tier or block number take priority? it depends on the request. need to make sure filtering is right and then it should work tier before block_number
/// TODO: should this return a struct that implements sorting traits?
fn sort_on(&self, max_block: Option<U64>) -> (bool, u32, Reverse<U64>) {
fn sort_on(&self, max_block: Option<U64>) -> (bool, Reverse<U64>, u32) {
let mut head_block = self
.head_block
.as_ref()
@ -253,13 +253,13 @@ impl Web3Rpc {
let backup = self.backup;
(!backup, tier, Reverse(head_block))
(!backup, Reverse(head_block), tier)
}
pub fn sort_for_load_balancing_on(
&self,
max_block: Option<U64>,
) -> ((bool, u32, Reverse<U64>), OrderedFloat<f64>) {
) -> ((bool, Reverse<U64>, u32), OrderedFloat<f64>) {
let sort_on = self.sort_on(max_block);
let weighted_peak_ewma_seconds = self.weighted_peak_ewma_seconds();
@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ impl Web3Rpc {
pub fn shuffle_for_load_balancing_on(
&self,
max_block: Option<U64>,
) -> ((bool, u32, Reverse<U64>), u8) {
) -> ((bool, Reverse<U64>, u32), u8) {
let sort_on = self.sort_on(max_block);
let mut rng = nanorand::tls_rng();