disable db stats for now
This commit is contained in:
parent
7ea23371aa
commit
f217bf33b3
@ -140,49 +140,53 @@ impl StatBuffer {
|
|||||||
// update the latest balance
|
// update the latest balance
|
||||||
// do this BEFORE emitting any stats
|
// do this BEFORE emitting any stats
|
||||||
let mut approximate_balance_remaining = 0.into();
|
let mut approximate_balance_remaining = 0.into();
|
||||||
if let Some(db_conn) = self.db_conn.as_ref() {
|
|
||||||
let user_id = stat.authorization.checks.user_id;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// update the user's balance
|
// TODO: re-enable this once I know its not the cause of Polygon W3P crashing all the time
|
||||||
if user_id != 0 {
|
if false {
|
||||||
// update the user's cached balance
|
if let Some(db_conn) = self.db_conn.as_ref() {
|
||||||
let mut user_balance = stat.authorization.checks.latest_balance.write().await;
|
let user_id = stat.authorization.checks.user_id;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// TODO: move this to a helper function
|
// update the user's balance
|
||||||
user_balance.total_frontend_requests += 1;
|
if user_id != 0 {
|
||||||
user_balance.total_spent += stat.compute_unit_cost;
|
// update the user's cached balance
|
||||||
|
let mut user_balance = stat.authorization.checks.latest_balance.write().await;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if !stat.backend_rpcs_used.is_empty() {
|
// TODO: move this to a helper function
|
||||||
user_balance.total_cache_misses += 1;
|
user_balance.total_frontend_requests += 1;
|
||||||
|
user_balance.total_spent += stat.compute_unit_cost;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if !stat.backend_rpcs_used.is_empty() {
|
||||||
|
user_balance.total_cache_misses += 1;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// if paid_credits_used is true, then they were premium at the start of the request
|
||||||
|
if stat.authorization.checks.paid_credits_used {
|
||||||
|
// TODO: this lets them get a negative remaining balance. we should clear if close to 0
|
||||||
|
user_balance.total_spent_paid_credits += stat.compute_unit_cost;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// check if they still have premium
|
||||||
|
if user_balance.active_premium() {
|
||||||
|
// TODO: referall credits here? i think in the save_db section still makes sense for those
|
||||||
|
} else if let Err(err) = self.user_balance_cache.invalidate(&user_balance.user_id, db_conn, &self.rpc_secret_key_cache).await {
|
||||||
|
// was premium, but isn't anymore due to paying for this query. clear the cache
|
||||||
|
// TODO: stop at <$0.000001 instead of negative?
|
||||||
|
warn!(?err, "unable to clear caches");
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
} else if user_balance.active_premium() {
|
||||||
|
// paid credits were not used, but now we have active premium. invalidate the caches
|
||||||
|
// TODO: this seems unliekly. should we warn if this happens so we can investigate?
|
||||||
|
if let Err(err) = self.user_balance_cache.invalidate(&user_balance.user_id, db_conn, &self.rpc_secret_key_cache).await {
|
||||||
|
// was premium, but isn't anymore due to paying for this query. clear the cache
|
||||||
|
// TODO: stop at <$0.000001 instead of negative?
|
||||||
|
warn!(?err, "unable to clear caches");
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
approximate_balance_remaining = user_balance.remaining();
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// if paid_credits_used is true, then they were premium at the start of the request
|
// self.accounting_db_buffer.entry(stat.accounting_key(self.billing_period_seconds)).or_default().add(stat.clone(), approximate_balance_remaining).await;
|
||||||
if stat.authorization.checks.paid_credits_used {
|
|
||||||
// TODO: this lets them get a negative remaining balance. we should clear if close to 0
|
|
||||||
user_balance.total_spent_paid_credits += stat.compute_unit_cost;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// check if they still have premium
|
|
||||||
if user_balance.active_premium() {
|
|
||||||
// TODO: referall credits here? i think in the save_db section still makes sense for those
|
|
||||||
} else if let Err(err) = self.user_balance_cache.invalidate(&user_balance.user_id, db_conn, &self.rpc_secret_key_cache).await {
|
|
||||||
// was premium, but isn't anymore due to paying for this query. clear the cache
|
|
||||||
// TODO: stop at <$0.000001 instead of negative?
|
|
||||||
warn!(?err, "unable to clear caches");
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
} else if user_balance.active_premium() {
|
|
||||||
// paid credits were not used, but now we have active premium. invalidate the caches
|
|
||||||
// TODO: this seems unliekly. should we warn if this happens so we can investigate?
|
|
||||||
if let Err(err) = self.user_balance_cache.invalidate(&user_balance.user_id, db_conn, &self.rpc_secret_key_cache).await {
|
|
||||||
// was premium, but isn't anymore due to paying for this query. clear the cache
|
|
||||||
// TODO: stop at <$0.000001 instead of negative?
|
|
||||||
warn!(?err, "unable to clear caches");
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
approximate_balance_remaining = user_balance.remaining();
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
self.accounting_db_buffer.entry(stat.accounting_key(self.billing_period_seconds)).or_default().add(stat.clone(), approximate_balance_remaining).await;
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if self.influxdb_client.is_some() {
|
if self.influxdb_client.is_some() {
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user